For this blog post, I would like to take my first skills post, edit and proofread it.
During Writing class, our teacher gave us an assignment to compare and contrast two or three different camps. I chose to compare and contrats Camp Big Apple and Ranch West Camp. In these two camps, I would like to compare and contrat the teachers and the living condition/situation.
At Camp Big Apple (CBA) the teachers have at least a masters degree but I wouldn't know what the degree would be for. However, the teachers would have had to earn their degree at an American college. To me this means that they can understand english well. However there is still no evidence that the teachers and teach well. At Ranch West Camp (RWC), the teachers are all recent graduates from the local university. That means to me, the teachers are inexpirenced. While the teachers were at the university they might have majored in something besides english. This leads me to believe that the teachers at RWC are not as good as the teachers at CBA.
At CBA, the students all live in dorms. At RWC, the students live with another family. I think these camps are alike because one doesn't live alone. At CBA, one's room mates will be from all over the world. That means that they cannot communicate in their home language and will have to speak English to communicate with each other. Living in a dorm is also a good studing environment. In contrast, RWC is a home-stay situation. There are always possibilities that you may not like the family's rules or you just might not like the family. Canada also has two national languages (French and English) so the family you stay with might speak a lot of french. These reasons lead me to believe that the housing at CBA is better for both learning english and is a better studying environment.
There are many more pros and cons to these camps but using these two arguements I have decided to go to CBA because CBA's housing and teachers make it a better camp than RWC.
Who are these people?
14 years ago